grievances.

so. today, you're not going to get much except complaining and whining. that's what i do here. that what everyone does on here.

anyway.

thesis: lance armstrong's abilities are overrated and such a thing as armstrong being a heartthrob has now pushed my joke button. that was mean. but come on! how come he gets all the credit? if anyone is even informed about the cycling world nowadays, it's about how lance armstrong won the tour of california or is now going out with lucille ball's corpse or is reading harry potter and now everyone else should too.

gah. why is that so? there are other cyclists out there who are way better than he is and have achieved many more accomplishments that he has, and they don't get nearly enough credit or attention as armstrong. like alberto cantador! he won the giro d'italia, the tour de france, and that spanish race. psh. armstrong never even competed in the giro!

and george hincapie. he was the only cyclist who served under armstrong's thumb for all of his tour de france wins. i find it very unfair how he gets no credit, just maybe a sentence or two in the article, "ARMSTRONG DOES IT AGAIN!"

if he comes on here and sees what i've put, he's going to screw me over. but geez, you're really not all that, kk?